ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Fracture risk in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInvestigate skeletal morbidity (SM) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients undergoing CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) and endocrine therapy (ET).
methodsIn this retrospective study we evaluated skeletal morbidity - defined as the occurrence of skeletal-related events (SREs) in metastatic bone and fragility fractures in non-metastatic bone - in 214 MBC patients who had received ET and CDK4/6is. As secondary aim, we compared VF progression, defined as a new fracture or worsening of a pre-existing fracture at spine CT scan, between 121 patients receiving ET alone (cohort A) and 121 patients on ET plus CDK4/6is (cohort B), balanced using propensity score.
resultsAmong the 147 patients (68.7%) with bone metastases, 59 (40.1%) experienced SREs including non-vertebral pathologic fractures (17 patients, 11.6%), pathologic VF progression (21 patients, 14.3%), spinal cord compression (3 patients, 2.0%), radiation to bone (18 patients, 12.2%). Considering the non-metastatic bone, 3 out of 214 patients (1.4%) experienced new non-vertebral fragility fractures, and 26 patients (12.2%) had fragility VF progression. In the comparative study, pathologic VF progression in metastatic bone was 38.3% in cohort A and 29.1% in cohort B (p = 0.093). The corresponding fragility VF progression rate in non-metastatic bone was 22.3% and 12.4% (p = 0.031).
conclusionsA considerable proportion of women with MBC treated with CDK4/6is + ET experience SM on both metastatic and non-metastatic bone. Patients treated with CDK4/6is + ET had lower SM than those on ET alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41557073What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.