ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Real-world outcomes of reduced-dose versus standard-dose antibody drug conjugates in metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether reduced doses (RD) of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) or sacituzumab govitecan (SG) provide similar outcomes to the approved standard doses (SD) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC).
methodsThis retrospective cohort included mBC patients receiving at least one cycle of SG (April 2021-May 2024) or T-DXd (February 2020-December 2024). Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-Rank tests estimated and compared PFS and OS from treatment initiation. Subgroup analyses were performed by HER2 and hormone receptor status.
results48 patients received SG (24 RD vs. 24 SD) and 66 received T-DXd (29 RD vs. 37 SD). Median PFS for SG was 3 months in both SD (95% CI, 2-10) and RD (95% CI, 2-8; p = 0.8). Median OS for SG was 10 months (95% CI, 7-13) for SD and 11 months (95% CI, 5-30; p = 0.4) for RD. For T-DXd, median PFS was 10.4 months for SD (95% CI, 7.0-14.5) and 11.2 months for RD (95% CI, 5.4-31.1; p = 0.8), while median OS was 18.3 months (95% CI, 13.9-NA) for SD and 28.1 months (95% CI, 18.2-NA; p = 0.9) for RD. Overall response rates were similar between patients receiving RD and SD SG or T-DXd.
conclusionsThis real-world data suggest RD of SG or T-DXd achieve outcomes comparable to SD, supporting prospective evaluation of lower-dose regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.