Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41557017›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Pitching-specific facilitation of upper-limb corticospinal excitability during motor imagery of sports motor skills.

Daiki Yamasaki, Naotsugu Kaneko, Tatsuya Kato, Yume Mashiki, Kimitaka Nakazawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daiki YamasakiDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0603-0242
Naotsugu KanekoDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan. kaneko@idaten.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1587-9287
Tatsuya KatoJapan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, 102-0083, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4493-2200
Yume MashikiDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2164-0816
Kimitaka NakazawaDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan. nakazawa@idaten.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-8659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pitching is an essential skill in baseball, requiring precise and well-coordinated neural control. However, elucidating its underlying neural mechanisms remains challenging because of the methodological difficulties in assessing neural activity during dynamic movement. Motor imagery (MI) provides a potential approach for investigating neural control in pitching, as MI of basic movements activates neural processes similar to those during actual movement. This study examined how MI of pitching, with and without visual guidance, modulates corticospinal excitability in muscles involved in pitching. Electromyographic activity was recorded from the flexor carpi radialis (FCR), extensor carpi radialis, first dorsal interosseous, and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles. Corticospinal excitability was evaluated by motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes, elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation to the primary motor cortex. MEPs were measured during kinesthetic MI across five sports skills, using only MI in Experiment 1 and using MI with a model video (vMI) in Experiment 2. Results showed that both types of baseball-MI significantly facilitated corticospinal excitability in APB, and baseball-vMI significantly facilitated corticospinal excitability in FCR, but not in other recorded muscles compared with those at rest. These results likely reflect the relative contribution and functional role of each muscle and fine motor control in actual pitching. The facilitation in APB was specific to baseball-MI/vMI, and this specificity is further supported by the findings that each sport's MI/vMI selectively facilitated corticospinal excitability in the muscle involved in the imagined movements. These findings provide foundational knowledge and a methodology for investigating the modulation of corticospinal excitability during pitching.

Indexed as

BaseballEvoked Potentials, MotorImaginationMotor CortexMotor SkillsMuscle, SkeletalPyramidal TractsUpper ExtremityAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultCorticospinal excitabilityMotor imageryPitchingTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41557017
PMCPMC12819569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.