ArticleMolecular biology reports2026
Molecular identification of pelagic fish eggs with oil globule.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMarine fish eggs exhibit transversal morphological characteristics that complicate their identification. It is estimated that 75% of pelagic eggs possess oil globule(s). Identifying these eggs provides valuable information about spawning biomass and potential spawning areas for commercially important and threatened species. Molecular markers, such as the FISH (COI gene), enable a precise identification and exploration of the genetic variability within fish populations. San Vicente Bay, located in south-central Chile is partially protected from the effects of the Humboldt current, making it a notable spawning and nursery ground for various fish species. This study aims to identify and characterize, oil-globule-containing eggs present in the bay during October, a period that aligns with the spawning season of many species. METHODS AND
resultsThis study seek to standardize the DNA extraction method and PCR process, addressing the challenges posed by the low quantities of tissue in these eggs. We employed 2 methods, by a DNA extraction kit and Chelex resin. Out of 94 eggs, 24 samples yielded positive PCR results, corresponding to a 25% of success. All these eggs were successfully identified using genetic databases, revealing a total of 9 genera and 8 species. The observed genetic distances at the species level were low, supporting the hypothesis that the eggs originated from the same female or gene mutation rate.
conclusionThe methods employed successfully identified fish eggs and documented species whose early life stages have not been previously reported in the bay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41557005What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.