Article in Cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Rachel A BurgeDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-9363-4333
Ozgun Le RouxDepartment of Pharmacology & Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-9885-6872
Olesja PopowDepartment of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-9683-5971
Victoria K SpadaforaDepartment of Pediatrics, Darby Children's Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-9440-0467
Christabelle RajeshDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-5211-4454
Sara J AdairDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-9973-4252
Lucas BialousowDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-1126-8670
Cailey MurphyDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0009-0008-8203-3733
Samaneh SaberiDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-5246-9092
Silvia G VaenaBioinformatics Core, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0009-0004-5811-1659
Margaret C TaqueyCollege of Graduate Studies, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0009-0001-4181-7610
Sarah AllenDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0009-0007-1079-400X
Lu HanDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-9842-2636
Kristi L HelkeDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-9746-0764
Sudarshana SharmaDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-9745-0061
Michael C OstrowskiDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-2948-6297
Denis C GuttridgeDepartment of Pediatrics, Darby Children's Research Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-7276-6609
Toros A DincmanHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-4449-0510
Todd W BauerDepartment of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-9516-1848
David F KashatusDepartment Microbiology, Immunology, and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0001-8007-0612
Thomas McFallDepartment of Biochemistry and MCW Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-5284-6994
Kevin M HaigisDepartment of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-1922-4509
Michael A HollingsworthEppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.ORCID 0000-0002-5255-8888
Christopher M CounterDepartment of Pharmacology & Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-0748-3079
Channing J DerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-7751-2747
G Aaron HobbsDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-4751-9681
Funding
Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Dina Gould Halme · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
Translational Science Laboratory Shared ResourceP30CA138313 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI John J Lemasters · 2009 to 2026
$42.7M
The role of SMAD1 and SATB2 in colon patterningP20GM130457 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Evan R Delgado · 2020 to 2026
$18.7M
Pancreatic Cancer Detection ConsortiumU01CA210240 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Michael A. Hollingsworth · 2017 to 2026
$12.9M
The role of the macroenvironment in pancreatic cancer-induced cachexiaP01CA236778 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI NEELON, BRIAN · 2021 to 2025
$9.7M
Origin, diversification and function of pancreatic cancer associated fibroblastsR00CA263005 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Lu Han · 2024 to 2026
$747k
Abney Foundation (AF)American Cancer Society (ACS) IRG 19-138-34Cancer Research UK (CRUK)Concern Foundation (The Concern Foundation)Mark Foundation For Cancer Research (Mark Foundation)National Cancer Institute (NCI) 1R01CA276771National Cancer Institute (NCI) P01CA203657National Cancer Institute (NCI) P01CA203657 and R35CA232113National Cancer Institute (NCI) P30CA014236National Cancer Institute (NCI) P50CA196510National Cancer Institute (NCI) P50CA257911National Cancer Institute (NCI) R01CA269272National Cancer Institute (NCI) R01CA42978National Cancer Institute (NCI) U01CA199235NCI NIH HHS P01 CA236778NCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138313NCI NIH HHS R00 CA263005NCI NIH HHS U01 CA210240NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130457Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PCAN) 22-20-HOBBPancreatic Cancer Action Network (PCAN) 22-WG-DERBU.S. Department of Defense (DOD) W81XWH2110692
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) harboring KRASG12R mutations have increased overall survival relative to patients with KRASG12D/V mutations. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this differential outcome, we developed a genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) harboring KrasG12R and Trp53R172H mutations (KrasLSL-G12R/+;Trp53LSL-R172H/+;p48Cre-ERTM). Unlike KrasG12D models, KrasG12R GEMMs exhibited limited tumorigenesis, with only 10% developing pancreatic tumors after 1 year. Additionally, mice harboring whole-body expression of KrasG12R remained healthy for over 1 year, whereas KrasG12D mice developed rapid multifocal disease. Comparison of KRAS mutant-selective transcription and signaling in murine and human PDAC cell lines, GEMMs, and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models revealed that direct KRAS-mediated PI3K activation is necessary for robust tumor initiation in GEMMs. Unexpectedly, KRAS was not the primary driver of PI3K activity in human PDAC cell lines and PDX models, regardless of KRAS mutation. KRASG12R and KRASG12D activated a similar pancreas-specific transcriptional network, but KRASG12R promoted these pathways less robustly due to limited ERK/MAPK nuclear translocation. Finally, KRASG12R human pancreatic tumors had an altered tumor microenvironment (TME) with reduced collagen deposition and metastatic liver invasion. Together, this study demonstrated that KRASG12R is capable of driving tumorigenesis despite the reduced ERK/MAPK nuclear translocation and transcriptional output. Although human KRASG12D- and KRASG12R-mutant tumors display unexpected similarities in PI3K activity, the differential ERK/MAPK signaling activity and the extrinsic consequences on the TME provide support for using KRASG12R mutation status as a prognostic biomarker for therapeutic strategies. SIGNIFICANCE: KRASG12R-mutant pancreatic cancer is characterized by lower ERK/MAPK nuclear translocation and transcriptional output than KRASG12D-mutant tumors, offering a potential window for patients with KRASG12R mutations to derive additional benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. See related commentary by Tiriac and Engle, p. 1817 See related article by Burge et al., p. 1854 See related article by Kamgar et al., p. 2042.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
KRASG12R-Mutant Pancreatic Cancer Features Limited ERK/MAPK Transcriptional Activity and a Distinctive Tumor Microenvironment. · full record | OpenQuestion