ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2026
Evaluating rural healthcare workforce programs: Applying modified whole-of-person retention improvement framework in VHA programs.
Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Train Rural, Work Rural: The Potential for Advanced Fellowships in Addressing Rural VA Healthcare Workforce Shortages.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
- Evaluating rural healthcare workforce programs: Applying modified whole-of-person retention improvement framework in VHA programs.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHealthcare workforce shortages are acute in rural areas. Using a holistic workforce retention framework, we examined evidence and identified gaps in recruitment and retention programs, using the Veterans Health Administration as a case study.
methodsRural workforce recruitment and retention initiatives were identified using VHA's 2023 Rural Recruitment and Hiring plan, and classified by rural focus, recruitment or retention, and strength of evidence. Initiatives were then mapped to a modified whole-of-person retention improvement framework (WoP-RIF) to assess coverage of domains: workplace/organizational, role/career, community/place, and financial.
findingsOf 31 VHA initiatives, 19% exclusively focused on the rural workforce, 35% included rural, and 45% had no specific geographic target. One third (32%) focused on recruitment only, 48% focused on recruitment and retention, and 19% focused on retention only. Nearly three-quarters (71%) lacked sufficient evidence or were too early in implementation to assess effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the initiative. The strongest evidence existed for education loan repayment and nursing residency programs. For modified WoP-RIF domains, about half of initiatives focused on financial incentives (52%) or workplace/organizational programs (42%); 35% focused on role/career opportunities; and only three (10%) focused on community/place.
conclusionWhile initiatives exist to address workforce shortages in rural areas, using the VHA as a case study, these are more focused on recruitment than retention, and few address important aspects of retention outside of financial or workplace domains. More rigorous and holistic evaluations of workforce initiatives using the modified WoP-RIF framework would bolster evidence across the span of recruitment to retention for rural workforce development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.