ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2026
Liquid Patterning Using Droplet Impact on Textured Nonwetting Surfaces.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Controlling the shape and contact area that an impacting droplet makes with a solid substrate has significant implications in numerous industrial processes, including inkjet printing and spray cooling. Here, we report a unique approach that offers an extraordinary ability to precisely control and manipulate the contact shape of a droplet impinging on nonwetting well-structured silicon micropillars. Our experiments show that the wetted Wenzel-type contact area can take on various polygonal shapes, including square, rectangle, hexagon, octagon, and dodecagon, depending on the pillar density (diameter-to-spacing ratio), arrangement (inline versus staggered), and/or the droplet contact angle. Experiments show that inline pillars give rise to a square, rectangle, or octagon shape while staggered pillars give rise to a hexagon, dodecagon, or extended hexagon shape. Rooted in the fundamentals of contact line physics, we develope a closed form unified analytical model that accurately captures the steady-state and transient wetting morphology of the impinging droplet. Furthermore, we show that the model is applicable for analyzing entrapped bubble retraction mechanism during high-velocity droplet impact. Lastly, the outcomes of this study demonstrate the similarity of the shape of the wetted area induced by droplet impact on nonwetting surfaces with that obtained via sessile droplet evaporation on wetting surfaces. The shape selection strategy reported in this study has promising applications in facile microfabrication of lab-on-a-chip devices, polymer-based printed electronics, biomicroarrays, and droplet-based electronics thermal management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.