ArticleArthritis care & research2026
Differential Item Functioning on the Patient Health Questionnaire 8 by Disease Subtype, Language, Sex, and Age Among People With Systemic Sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort Study.
Article in Arthritis care & research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSomatic items used in depression assessments can potentially overlap with symptoms related to physical illness, including systemic sclerosis (SSc). No studies have looked at whether somatic depression items may be influenced by diffuse versus limited SSc disease subtypes, which are associated with varying degrees of symptom presentation. The objective of this study was to evaluate differential item functioning (DIF) in items of the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) across SSc subtypes. We also assessed the PHQ-8 for DIF across language (English and French), sex, and age.
methodsParticipants enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient-Centered Intervention Network Cohort who completed the PHQ-8 at enrollment between April 2014 and October 2020 were included. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the unidimensional structure of the PHQ-8, and DIF analyses based on SSc subtype, language, sex, and age were conducted using Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes models.
resultsIn total, 2,191 participants were included. CFA with several covarying error terms supported a one-factor structure for the PHQ-8 (Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.99, Comparative Fit Index = 0.98, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.08). We did not identify statistically significant DIF based on SSc subtype. Statistically significant DIF was found in one item for language, one item for sex, and two items for age. However, the effect of DIF on overall PHQ-8 scores was negligeable in all cases.
conclusionWe did not find evidence that the PHQ-8 performs differently across SSc subtypes, language of administration, sex, and age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.