Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41556564›Full record

ArticleNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2026

A website calculator to benchmark the carbon footprint of haemodialysis.

Joachim Beige, Susi Knöller, Martin Pachmann, Falk Sommer, Hans Peter Barth, Michael Masanneck, Werner Kleophas, Roman Schaffron, Sylvia Stracke, Kirsten deGroot and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Joachim BeigeKuratorium for Dialysis and Transplantation, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1907-825X
Susi KnöllerKuratorium for Dialysis and Transplantation, Neu-Isenburg, Germany>.
Martin PachmannFresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Falk SommerGreentec Dialysis, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans Peter BarthGreentec Dialysis, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael MasanneckKuratorium for Dialysis and Transplantation, Neu-Isenburg, Germany>.
Werner KleophasDaVita Healthcare, Hamburg, Germany.
Roman SchaffronDaVita Healthcare, Hamburg, Germany.
Sylvia StrackeKuratorium for Dialysis and Transplantation, Neu-Isenburg, Germany>.
Kirsten deGrootKuratorium for Dialysis and Transplantation, Neu-Isenburg, Germany>.
Julia Weinmann-MenkeGerman Society of Nephrology, Berlin, Germany.
Simone Cosima Boedecker-LipsDivision of Nephrology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Raymond VanholderEuropean Kidney Health Initiative, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2633-1636

Funding

Horizon Europe 101137054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaemodialysis (HD) contributes vastly to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Recognizing this, the German Society for Nephrology initiated a web-based carbon footprint assessment tool to benchmark emissions.

methodsThis study collected data from five pilot HD centres between 2015 and 2023. Emission categories appropriate for HD were defined and included transportation, energy consumption, manufacturing/disposal and other operational factors.

resultsThe all-centre, all-period average was 3.72 ± 0.44 tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per patient per year, with manufacturing/disposal, energy consumption and patient transportation as the largest contributions. Over the assessment period, a reduction of 9.1% was achieved, through changes in dialysate flow (-0.16 tons/patient/year), solar power system installation (-0.21 tons/patient/year) and transition to a planetary health-adapted diet (-0.10 tons/patient/year). A best-case scenario with modelled implementation of all ready-to-use measures, including 40% of patients switching to automated peritoneal dialysis and 10% to incremental HD, projected a reduction potential of 38.7% or 1.5 tons/patient/year, substantially less than what is needed to reach net zero.

conclusionsUsing available technology, HD-related GHG emissions were reduced by 9% in the short term. Higher future reductions to meet the targets of a 50% reduction by 2030 and net zero by 2045 might necessitate enhancing prevention and transplantation efforts, technological innovation, support chain adaptations and structural changes like increased use of peritoneal dialysis.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingCarbon FootprintGreenhouse GasesInternetKidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisHumansGreenhouse Gasescalculatorcarbon footprintdialysisgreenhouse gaswebtool

Identifiers

PMID41556564
PMCPMC13403270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.