ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2026
Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite, Ozone, Diode Laser, and Photodynamic Therapy Against Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans: An In-Vitro Study.
Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePersistent bacterial contamination of the root canal system, particularly by Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans), remains a major obstacle in endodontic therapy. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is widely recognized as the gold-standard irrigant due to its broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties. However, its cytotoxicity has prompted the exploration of alternative or adjunctive disinfection methods, including ozone therapy, diode lasers, and photodynamic therapy (PDT). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial efficacy of NaOCl, ozone, diode laser, and PDT-used alone or in combination with NaOCl-against E. faecalis and S. mutans in vitro. MATERIALS AND
methodsStandard strains (E. faecalis ATCC 29212 and S. mutans ATCC 25175) were inoculated into 96-well microplates and exposed to the designated treatments following standardized protocols. In the combination groups, NaOCl was applied first, followed immediately by the secondary modality without rinsing. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were quantified by plating on Brain Heart Infusion agar and incubating under appropriate conditions. Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with post-hoc pairwise comparisons (p 0.05).
resultsNaOCl, both alone and in combination, completely eradicated both bacterial species. Among the alternative methods, ozone gas and PDT statistically significantly reduced S. mutans counts but were less effective against E. faecalis. Diode laser and ozonated water exhibited minimal antimicrobial activity. No synergistic enhancement was observed in the combination groups.
conclusionsNaOCl remains the most effective agent for root canal disinfection. Although ozone and PDT showed moderate efficacy-particularly against S. mutans-they may serve as adjunctive options when NaOCl use is limited. Further research is warranted to optimize these alternative approaches for clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.