ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Foundation Model-Enabled Multimodal Deep Learning for Prognostic Prediction in Colorectal Cancer with Incomplete Modalities: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for Radiomics in Oncology: Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and computational prediction models for risk stratification, treatment response, and outcomes in colorectal cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prognostic prediction for colorectal cancer is essential for optimizing personalized treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. Current unimodal approaches encounter significant limitations in effectively leveraging multimodal data and confront challenges with the issue of missing modalities. A novel multimodal deep learning framework named FLARE, which integrates pathological images, radiological imaging, and clinical text reports, is introduced to provide accurate risk assessments for colorectal cancer survival and progression. FLARE employs foundation models to achieve efficient feature extraction, utilizes an attention-based multi-branch framework to enhance synergy and distinctiveness across modalities, and incorporates a diversity-promoting loss function. To address the issue of incomplete data, FLARE integrates modality and missing-aware prompts, pseudo embeddings, and a modality-level augmentation strategy, thereby effectively mitigating potential performance degradation. The performance of FLARE is retrospectively assessed using a dataset of 1679 colorectal cancer patients from four independent clinical centers. Its superior prognostic capability is demonstrated through Kaplan-Meier analysis and the concordance index. FLARE effectively stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups. It achieved the highest concordance index across all validation cohorts, significantly outperforming traditional clinical models and existing multimodal methods, thereby highlighting its robust generalizability. Interpretability was enhanced by the comprehensive analyses of clinical factors, immune infiltration patterns, and gene pathways, as well as visualizations of feature importance across multiple modalities. In summary, FLARE establishes a comprehensive and robust framework for multimodal deep learning in medical prognostics, providing an advanced Artificial intelligence, Multimodal Deep Learning, Prognosis prediction, colorectal cancer, foundation modeltool for precision cancer prognosis and intelligent diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.