ArticleActa odontologica Scandinavica2026
The effect of age on third molar extraction difficulty: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study.
Article in Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comments on "The effect of age on third molar extraction difficulty: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study" - Danger in describing 'simplicity' in third molar surgery.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Response to the Letter to the Editor by Prof. Dr. Aydin Gülses regarding our article 'The effect of age on third molar extraction difficulty: A retrospective cross-sectional cohort study'.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to clarify whether third molar extraction becomes more difficult as the patient ages. Previous research results on the topic are contradictory. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll 12,649 third molar extractions in Helsinki's primary care during 2016 were retrieved from electronic records using treatment codes. The primary outcome was extraction difficulty, classified as simple (forceps) or surgical (raising a flap). The secondary outcome was an extraction labelled as demanding. Predictor variables were age, sex, and the jaw (maxilla/mandible). Statistical analyses included χ2 test and binomial logistic regression.
resultsMean age of the patients was 32.2 years (range 12-97 years). Simple extractions in the maxilla (P < 0.001) and all surgical extractions (P < 0.001) were more likely to be demanding at a higher age. In the mandible, simple extractions were easier at a higher age (odds ratio [OR] 0.971; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.964; 0.978). Surgical extraction was 1.4 times (95% CI 1.145; 1.766) more likely to be demanding in men and twice (95% CI 1.143; 3.462) as demanding in the mandible.
conclusionsSurgical and maxillary simple extractions were more difficult at a higher age. Surprisingly, in the mandible, simple extractions were easier at a higher age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.