ArticleJournal of sleep research2026
Screens, Teens, and Sleep: Is the Impact of Nighttime Screen Use on Sleep Driven by Physiological Arousal?
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Few studies have objectively measured both screens and sleep in real-world settings. This study uses repeated measures to assess heart rate during evening screen use, providing new insights into how these behaviours relate to adolescent sleep. Screen use was recorded using wearable cameras over four nights in 70 youth (37% indigenous Māori, 42% female) aged 11-14.9 years. Heart rate was measured via a Fitbit Inspire 2. Mixed effects regression models were used to estimate within-person differences in heart rate across screen behaviours and time periods, as well as associations with sleep outcomes. Median heart rate was lower during screen use than during non-screen activities (83 BPM, [IQR: 77-91] vs. 93 [IQR: 87-100]). Social media use most proximal to bedtime was associated with slightly lower heart rate compared to other screen activities (-3 BPM, 95% CI: -5, -1), while communication was associated with slightly higher heart rate (3 BPM, 95% CI: 1, 5). Heart rate in the 2 h before bed was not associated with sleep outcomes except for sleep latency; which increased by 9 min (95% CI: 3, 14) for every 10 BPM increase in heart rate. Evening screen use may be a relaxation tool for youth, with social media, gaming and multitasking having minimal physiological impact. In contrast, communication activities were less conducive to relaxation, though differences were small and effects on sleep only modest. Thus, relationships between screen use and sleep are more likely driven by changes in sleep timing rather than physiological arousal from screen exposure. Trial Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621000193875.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.