ArticleAdvanced biology2026
Dacarbazine as a Positive Control in Melanoma Cell Lines (A375, SK-MEL-103, 1205Lu) and a Human Ex Vivo Skin Model.
Article in Advanced biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dacarbazine as a Positive Control in Melanoma Cell Lines (A375, SK-MEL-103, 1205Lu) and a Human Ex Vivo Skin Model.Advanced biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One important step for evaluating and selecting a drug is toxicity studies, which are responsible for eliminating molecules that are considered promising for treating a certain disease based on their effectiveness in clinical studies, but are unsafe to go to the pharmaceutical market. We proposed an evaluation of dacarbazine as a positive control in toxicity effects in the context of macro- and micro effects represented by tissue and cell responses. A resazurin assay is used to evaluate cytotoxicity in cells (melanoma cells A375, Sk-Mel-103, and 1205Lu; immortalized skin cells HaCat and 3T3), and hematoxylin/eosin staining and TUNEL staining are used in skin explants. There is no toxicity demonstrated in the immortalized cells at the studied concentrations, whereas in the melanoma cells, A375 is the most sensitive to dacarbazine, with a high toxicity at all concentrations over 72 h (p < 0.05), Sk-Mel-103 showed toxicity effects only at 200 µg/mL, and 1205Lu showed no evidence of toxicity. Histological data showed that the entire skin structure of the explants is preserved, and no apoptotic cells are observed. Thus, we can conclude that cell lines behave differently when exposed to a drug, in this case Dacarbazine proved to be a good control for toxicity tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.