Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41556251›Full record

ArticleAdvanced biology2026

Dacarbazine as a Positive Control in Melanoma Cell Lines (A375, SK-MEL-103, 1205Lu) and a Human Ex Vivo Skin Model.

Marcel Nani Leite, Natália Aparecida de Paula Rios, Juliana Santos Rosa Viegas, Maria Vitória Lopes Badra Bentley, Leandra Náira Zambelli Ramalho, Enilza Maria Espreafico, Marco Andrey Cipriani Frade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcel Nani LeiteDivision of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2121-8688
Natália Aparecida de Paula RiosDivision of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juliana Santos Rosa ViegasSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Vitória Lopes Badra BentleySchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leandra Náira Zambelli RamalhoDepartment of Pathology and Legal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Enilza Maria EspreaficoDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Andrey Cipriani FradeDivision of Dermatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 423635/2018-2Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88882.180013/2018-01Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia 2016/16437-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One important step for evaluating and selecting a drug is toxicity studies, which are responsible for eliminating molecules that are considered promising for treating a certain disease based on their effectiveness in clinical studies, but are unsafe to go to the pharmaceutical market. We proposed an evaluation of dacarbazine as a positive control in toxicity effects in the context of macro- and micro effects represented by tissue and cell responses. A resazurin assay is used to evaluate cytotoxicity in cells (melanoma cells A375, Sk-Mel-103, and 1205Lu; immortalized skin cells HaCat and 3T3), and hematoxylin/eosin staining and TUNEL staining are used in skin explants. There is no toxicity demonstrated in the immortalized cells at the studied concentrations, whereas in the melanoma cells, A375 is the most sensitive to dacarbazine, with a high toxicity at all concentrations over 72 h (p < 0.05), Sk-Mel-103 showed toxicity effects only at 200 µg/mL, and 1205Lu showed no evidence of toxicity. Histological data showed that the entire skin structure of the explants is preserved, and no apoptotic cells are observed. Thus, we can conclude that cell lines behave differently when exposed to a drug, in this case Dacarbazine proved to be a good control for toxicity tests.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineMelanomaSkinSkin NeoplasmsAnimalsApoptosisCell Line, TumorHumansMiceAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazinecell linesdacarbazinehOSEC modelmelanomatoxicity

Identifiers

PMID41556251
PMCPMC12817238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.