ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2026
A quantitative approach to understanding the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on training opportunities for neurosurgical trainees in England.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe literature speaks to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic having a profound effect on surgical training. Our objective in this study was to quantify the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on neurosurgical training and to test whether an effect on the quality of neurosurgical training can be inferred from a quantitative methodology.
methodsSurgical training episodes logged by neurosurgical trainees with a National Training Number were provided by e-logbook for the period January 2019 to December 2023. This was crosslinked with trainee data provided by the Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Programme and compared with data from the Capse Healthcare Knowledge System, which records operative spells in English neurosurgical units, over the same period.
resultsSome 24,416 surgical training episodes were logged by trainees in 2023 compared with 32,033 in 2019. The ratio of surgical training episodes logged to operative spells recorded increased from 0.74 to 0.84 between 2019 and 2021, but fell to 0.72 by 2023. When filtered for elective cranial surgical training episodes logged compared with operative spells, the data show a significant drop from 67% to 60%. However, spinal surgical training episodes logged have risen from 58% to 70% of operative spells, although the number of surgical training episodes logged has declined by 1,118. The average number of surgical training episodes logged per year per trainee in 2019-2020 was 132, and this has risen every year and stands at 173 in 2022-2023.
conclusionsThe primary findings of this study are that the recording of training events is below pre-pandemic levels. In total, 4,617 fewer cases were logged in 2023 than in 2019 and the proportion of elective cranial cases logged compared with operative spells fell from 67% in 2019 to 60% in 2023. This study suggests further efforts are needed to safeguard training opportunities and maintain a high quality of training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.