Trial reportHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2026
Timing of birth to improve outcomes in chronic or gestational hypertension: the WILL RCT.
Trial report in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For women with chronic or gestational hypertension who remain well, early term birth (at 37-38 weeks' gestation) may reduce maternal complications, caesareans and stillbirths, but it may increase neonatal morbidity compared with expectant care. Expectant care may increase costs. There are no high-quality data to guide care, which currently involves maternal-fetal surveillance and intervention for maternal or fetal compromise, which may be rapid or unexpected. Objective: To investigate optimal timing of birth for women with chronic or gestational hypertension who reach term and remain well. Design: Pragmatic, unmasked, multicentre randomised trial with a health economic analysis. Setting: Fifty United Kingdom hospitals. Participants: Inclusion: maternal age ≥ 16 years, chronic or gestational hypertension, singleton pregnancy, live fetus, 36 Interventions: Planned early term birth at 38 Main outcome measures: Maternal coprimary: composite of 'poor maternal outcome' (severe hypertension, maternal death or maternal morbidity and superiority hypothesis). Neonatal coprimary: neonatal care unit admission ≥ 4 hours (non-inferiority hypothesis). Each coprimary is measured until primary hospital discharge or 28 days post birth (whichever is earlier). Key secondary: caesarean birth. Randomisation: 1 : 1 ratio, minimised for key prognostic variables: site, hypertension type and prior caesarean. Blinding: It was not possible to mask care providers or participants to the intervention. For the coprimary maternal outcome, there was local site principal investigator/delegate sign-off based on review, masked to allocated group, of primary case notes. Results: From 2019 to 2022, 403 participants were randomised (37% of target 1080) to intervention ( Limitations: Recruitment was 37% of the anticipated sample size (as above). Conclusions: Despite being unable to recruit to target in this study, we observed that most women with chronic or gestational hypertension required labour induction and planned birth at 38 Future work: An individual participant data meta-analysis is planned to address whether the intervention (vs. control) reduces caesarean; low adverse event rates would make unfeasible mounting another randomised trial. Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 16/167/123.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.