Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41556059›Full record

ArticleBJR case reports2026

Local control of locally advanced uterine sarcoma achieved by cervical brachytherapy with gel spacer following cyclic hypofractionated radiation therapy (QUAD shot) in a patient who refused surgery.

Yasuo Kosugi, Naoya Murakami, Tatsuki Karino, Yoichi Muramoto, Terufumi Kawamoto, Masaki Oshima, Noriyuki Okonogi, Anneyuko I Saito, Jun Takatsu, Tatsuya Inoue and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Yasuo KosugiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7974-2060
Naoya MurakamiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0660-9987
Tatsuki KarinoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9640-3444
Yoichi MuramotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8697-0498
Terufumi KawamotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-5577
Masaki OshimaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Noriyuki OkonogiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9486-1922
Anneyuko I SaitoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Jun TakatsuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9848-9251
Tatsuya InoueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0001-7921
Kotaro IijimaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-0175
Akane HashizumeDepartment of Pathology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan.
Shigeki TomitaDepartment of Pathology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan.
Masaya KatoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan.
Takafumi UjihiraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan.
Shintaro MakinoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan.
Takashi HirayamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Kazunari FujinoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Yasuhisa TeraoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9126-3361
Naoto ShikamaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy is not mentioned in various guidelines for primary treatment of uterine sarcoma. Radiation therapy is considered useful for palliative purposes, but an optimal radiation schedule has not been established. An 85-year-old woman was recommended to undergo surgery for locally advanced uterine sarcoma of unknown histological subtype, but she refused because of her poor physical and social circumstances. She instead received chemotherapy; however, the lesion progressed, and the patient opted for best supportive care. Palliative radiation therapy was indicated for genital bleeding. She thereafter received the QUAD shot regimen, in which 3.7 Gy was administered twice a day for 2 consecutive days and repeated every 4 weeks for a total dose of 44.4 Gy in 3 cycles. The lesion significantly decreased in size, and no new regional or distant metastases were identified. Although only palliative radiation therapy was initially intended, the favourable response with no new lesion development prompted us to offer additional brachytherapy for curative intent, and the patient accepted. She underwent 2 sessions of uterine cervical intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy using a gel spacer, and local control of the lesion was achieved at 1-year and 3 months follow-up of treatment without major adverse events. In select patients for whom a favourable response is achieved after the QUAD shot, the addition of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy with a gel spacer may result in curative treatment. This therapy could be a very promising and attractive option for patients with uterine sarcoma who have complications or special social circumstances.

Indexed as

definitive radiation therapyexternal beam radiation therapygel spacerintracavitary and interstitial (IC/IS) brachytherapyQUAD shot regimenuterine sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID41556059
PMCPMC12812167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.