ReviewCureus2025
Impact of Primary Care Mental Health Management on Emergency Psychiatric Presentations: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary care-based mental health management has been proposed as a strategy to reduce preventable psychiatric crises and lessen reliance on emergency departments, yet its impact remains uncertain across different populations and health systems. This review synthesized evidence from observational and quasi-experimental studies evaluating integrated, collaborative, or behavioral health home interventions within primary care and their association with emergency psychiatric utilization. Nine eligible studies were identified from a comprehensive search, most involving co-located or integrated behavioral health services aimed at improving continuity and outpatient engagement. Overall, interventions demonstrated consistent trends toward fewer psychiatric emergency visits, enhanced follow-up care, and better support for individuals with serious mental illness, although effect sizes varied and several studies were limited by methodological weaknesses such as confounding and selection bias. Two higher-quality studies showed moderate reductions in all-cause and psychiatric emergency use, while others reported mixed or modest effects. Collectively, the findings suggest that integrated primary care mental health approaches hold promise for reducing emergency presentations, but stronger, well-controlled research is needed to clarify which models yield the most meaningful and sustained reductions in acute care utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.