ReviewCureus2025
Socioeconomic Inequities in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Uptake Among Women: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global, regional, and temporal trends in aortic aneurysm burden, 1990-2021: insights from the Global Burden of Disease study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening vascular condition with higher rupture risk and poorer surgical outcomes in women compared to men. U.S. screening programs predominantly target men, potentially contributing to underdiagnosis among high-risk women. Socioeconomic factors may influence disparities in AAA screening participation. The aim of this narrative review is to synthesize evidence on socioeconomic determinants influencing AAA screening uptake among women in the United States and to explore potential equity-centered strategies. A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar for U.S.-based studies published between January 1990 and August 2025. Search terms included "abdominal aortic aneurysm," "AAA screening," "women," "socioeconomic status," "income," "education," "health disparities," and "screening uptake." Eligible studies included observational studies, cohort studies, retrospective analyses, policy reviews, and meta-analyses reporting AAA outcomes stratified by sex and at least one socioeconomic factor. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data on study characteristics, AAA outcomes, and socioeconomic determinants. Findings were synthesized narratively. Thirty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Evidence suggests that women experience lower AAA screening rates, influenced by guideline exclusions and intersecting socioeconomic factors. Lower income, limited education and health literacy, underinsurance, rural residence, and race/ethnicity were consistently associated with reduced screening uptake and delayed diagnosis. While the strength and consistency of associations varied across studies, socioeconomic determinants appeared to interact with female sex, potentially contributing to later-stage presentation and higher rupture risk. Socioeconomic inequities are associated with disparities in AAA screening among women. Integrating socioeconomic factors into screening policy and clinical practice, alongside targeted interventions, may help improve equity in detection. Future research should prioritize sex- and socioeconomic status (SES)-disaggregated data and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to enhance screening access for high-risk women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.