ArticleBJR open2026
Getting to the heart of Carotid and Vertebral imaging in acute ischemic stroke: an all-encompassing cross-sectional comparative analysis of Colour Doppler Ultrasound, CT Angiography, and MR Angiography.
Article in BJR open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study presents a comprehensive comparison of minimally-invasive extracranial neck imaging modalities-Colour Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), CT angiography (CTA), and MR angiography (MRA)-in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients. The aim was to evaluate vessel stenosis, its related parameters, and assess the role of early CTA/MRA in AIS. Methods: Categorical and continuous data were compared with Chi-square and independent Sample Results: AIS was most common in males, aged 61-70 years, associated with hypertension and smoking ( Conclusions: Colour Doppler ultrasound is subjective, comprehensive assessment of anatomic and hemodynamic parameters but lacks sensitivity in identifying vulnerable plaques. CTA/MRA have better sensitivity with good soft tissue differentiation especially in lesser stenosed vessels. Advances in knowledge: Our results support preferred use of MRA/CTA as first-line modalities in time-sensitive scenarios like acute stroke and need to move beyond CDUS-based assessment. These show promise in detecting vulnerable plaque and predicting AIS risk/recurrence; in patient triage, and to guide early intensive treatment. Longitudinal studies are required to assess risk reduction by early advanced imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.