ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Integration of chromosomal microarray analysis and whole-exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with cardiac ultrasound anomalies.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The incremental yield of CMA over karyotype in fetal ventriculomegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital heart disease is among the most prevalent birth defects. This study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) and whole-exome sequencing (WES) in prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders in fetuses with cardiac ultrasound abnormalities. Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzed 469 cases exhibiting fetal cardiac anomalies identified through prenatal ultrasound from November 2022 to July 2024. The study retrospectively assessed the patients' clinical features, observations, and pregnancy outcomes. Results: Out of the 469 cases meeting the inclusion criteria, conventional karyotyping identified chromosomal aneuploidies in 17 cases (3.62%). CMA identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic findings, including both aneuploidies and copy number variants, in 35 cases, yielding a detection rate of 7.46% (95% CI: 5.24%-10.21%). The incremental yield of CMA over karyotyping was 3.84%. WES was performed on 59 CMA-negative/variants of undetermined clinical significance cases, identifying pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 6/59 (10.17%; 95% CI 3.82%-20.87%), providing a cohort-level incremental yield of 1.28% (6/469). Conclusion: This study highlights the clinical significance of CMA and WES in the prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders in fetuses presenting with cardiac ultrasound abnormalities. It affirms the robust utility of CMA and WES methodologies in prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.