Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41555924›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025

Role of nursing and midwifery in mainstreaming genomics in Australia: mixed-methods study exploring scope of practice and strategies for implementation.

Kim E Alexander, Morgan J Farley, Brighid Scanlon, Jed Duff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kim E AlexanderSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Morgan J FarleySchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Brighid ScanlonSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jed DuffSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The integration of genomics into Australian health services offers significant benefits for the diagnosis and delivery of targeted treatments, but its success relies on a workforce equipped to deliver genomic-informed care. Nurses and midwives, Australia's largest healthcare workforce, have the potential to play a key role in the integration of genomic care into mainstream services by enabling access to the diverse and geographically spread Australian population. To achieve this, it is imperative to clearly define their roles in genomic practice and identify specific educational and resource needs. Methods: A two-part, mixed-method study was conducted encompassing a state-wide survey and a range of semi-structured interviews. The state-wide survey (n = 81), aimed to establish agreement on the key domains of genomic-related care practice for nurses and midwives. The semi-structured interviews with key practice change stakeholders (n = 32) sought to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing the genomic practice domains. Descriptive statistics were generated to summarise the quantitative findings. The qualitative data were analysed using content analysis, with the findings organised according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results: There was general agreement (>85%) that nurses and midwives should be involved, to varying extents, in 18 of the 31 domains of genomic-related care. The domains with the highest overall agreement included being able to identify clinical indicators of genetic susceptibility, ability to take a family history and have a general understanding of genomic information. The integration of genomics into nursing and midwifery faces several barriers, including unclear roles and responsibilities, system and organisational challenges, and a lack of tailored education. Key facilitators identified were dedicated nursing or midwifery roles, tailored, co-designed education, and collaboration with key stakeholders. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the need for clearly defined roles and scope of practice for nurses and midwives, supported by tailored, co-designed workforce development programs and implementation processes. Such approaches are essential to meet the varied needs and competencies of nurses and midwives and to fully enable the benefits of accessible genomic care.

Indexed as

genomic-informed caregenomicsmainstreamingnursing and midwiferyservice delivery

Identifiers

PMID41555924
PMCPMC12812403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.