ArticleMedical science educator2025
Development and Validation of a Tool for Evaluating Self-regulated and Self-directed Aptitudes of Learning (SELF-ReDiAL).
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Self-regulated learning (SRL) and self-directed learning (SDL) are widely studied in education, but debates about their relationship have hindered effective measurement in practice. The recently introduced SELF-ReDiAL framework (self-regulated and self-directed aptitudes of learning) addresses this by framing these as adaptable learning aptitudes, integrating SRL features and insights into SDL. Using this framework, we developed and validated a new tool to assess SELF-ReDiAL-particularly valuable for health students and professionals requiring lifelong learning-bridging educational theory and practice. Methods: Guided by the SELF-ReDiAL framework, a 30-item questionnaire was developed and administered to students in health-related disciplines across Australia, New Zealand, the UK, and Canada. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) assessed the scale's content and construct validity. Results: Overall, 315 responses were analysed (mean age: 23.20 ± 6.73 years, range: 17-58), including 241 women, 70 men, and 4 individuals using other gender terms. Following EFA, 20 items were retained, yielding a four-factor model: 'Inquisitiveness' (31.17% variance explained), 'Accomplishment' (4.46% variance explained), 'Implementation' (4.11% variance explained), and 'Independence' (2.54% variance explained). CFA confirmed model fit ( Discussion: The SELF-ReDiAL model offers a comprehensive perspective on learners' ability to take ownership of their learning when addressing gaps in professional knowledge. In health education, assessing SELF-ReDiAL helps identify influencing factors and informs strategies to enhance these aptitudes, prompting lifelong learning and ensuring high-quality patient care. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02454-0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.