Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41555907›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

Reduced Test Anxiety Among Medical Students in an Extremely Low-Stakes Examination.

Takayasu Ito, Osamu Nomura, Katsuki Hirai, Hiroaki Ushikoshi, Takuya Saiki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takayasu ItoCenter for Clinical Training and Career Development, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Osamu NomuraMedical Education Development Center, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1296-1768
Katsuki HiraiCenter for Regional Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Hiroaki UshikoshiCenter for Regional Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Takuya SaikiMedical Education Development Center, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Test anxiety has a deleterious effect on the academic performance of medical students. Medical educators shifted the focus of students' assessment from high-stakes examinations to low-stakes assessments to address the negative impacts of test anxiety on learning. Nevertheless, it is still uncertain whether low-stakes tests are an effective means of eliminating medical students' anxiety. Methods: The study's objective was to examine the degree to which medical students experience anxiety in the context of an extremely low-stakes test conducted in a group-based clinical reasoning class. A total of 75 students participated in the study, and their emotional responses during the clinical reasoning session and following the test session were assessed and compared using the Japanese version of the medical emotion scale. Results: The results demonstrated a decrease in self-reported anxiety levels toward the test compared with anxiety levels toward the clinical reasoning exercises conducted prior to the test (2.21 to 1.96). However, no changes were observed in the levels of other emotions. Discussion: Test anxiety experienced by medical students was found to diminish when the test was conducted in an extremely low-stakes format. This finding lends support to the efficacy of programmatic assessment from the perspective of medical students' well-being. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02468-8.

Indexed as

AssessmentEmotionMedical studentsTest anxiety

Identifiers

PMID41555907
PMCPMC12812151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.