Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41555905›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

Medical Students' Perceptions of an Assessment Program in the New Doctor of Medicine Curriculum.

Teerapat Ungtrakul, Supitcha Anuwongworavet, Nutnicha Rangchaikul, Nattanan Kongsaree, Napatr Wongboonkuakul, Thanaporn Thanyajaroen, Natcha Watanapokasin, Kamonwan Soonklang, Chirayu Auewarakul, Lois Haruna-Cooper and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Teerapat UngtrakulPrincess Srisavangavadhana Faculty of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Supitcha AnuwongworavetPrincess Srisavangavadhana Faculty of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nutnicha RangchaikulPrincess Srisavangavadhana Faculty of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nattanan KongsareePrincess Srisavangavadhana Faculty of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Napatr WongboonkuakulPrincess Srisavangavadhana Faculty of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanaporn ThanyajaroenPrincess Srisavangavadhana Faculty of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natcha WatanapokasinPrincess Srisavangavadhana Faculty of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kamonwan SoonklangPrincess Srisavangavadhana Faculty of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chirayu AuewarakulPrincess Srisavangavadhana Faculty of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Lois Haruna-CooperUCL Medical School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mohammed Ahmed RashidExecutive Office, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-1240
Nanthida PhattraprayoonPrincess Srisavangavadhana Faculty of Medicine, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0619-2248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the perspectives of medical students on the roles of formative assessments (FAs) and their impact on academic performance, with the goal of identifying areas for improvement. Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed the perspectives of students related to congruence, authenticity, consultation, transparency, and accommodation. Additionally, it explored students' preferences for FA, the usefulness of FA, and students' views and ideas on the effects of summative assessments (SAs) on their learning. A survey consisting of 36 items was distributed to medical students in their second and third years of medical school. Results: Most of the 40 participating students had a positive attitude toward their perceptions of FA, ranging from 78.13% to 93.33%. In addition, the students expressed that FA was beneficial to their academic experience. There were varying viewpoints on the level of stress caused by FA and which specific aspects of FA could be enhanced. Conclusions: FAs were feasible and beneficial. Most students viewed FAs favorably because they promoted learning experiences and achievements, and helped identify support needs for SAs, despite some concerns about them being time-consuming and stressful. The use of SAs facilitated better study strategies. However, potential improvements to FAs regarding the feedback process, assessment schedules, and alignment with teaching objectives were suggested to increase their usefulness.

Indexed as

Doctor of Medicine curriculumFormative assessmentMedical educationStudent perceptionSummative assessment

Identifiers

PMID41555905
PMCPMC12812118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.