ArticleMedical science educator2025
Medical Students' Perceptions of an Assessment Program in the New Doctor of Medicine Curriculum.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated the perspectives of medical students on the roles of formative assessments (FAs) and their impact on academic performance, with the goal of identifying areas for improvement. Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed the perspectives of students related to congruence, authenticity, consultation, transparency, and accommodation. Additionally, it explored students' preferences for FA, the usefulness of FA, and students' views and ideas on the effects of summative assessments (SAs) on their learning. A survey consisting of 36 items was distributed to medical students in their second and third years of medical school. Results: Most of the 40 participating students had a positive attitude toward their perceptions of FA, ranging from 78.13% to 93.33%. In addition, the students expressed that FA was beneficial to their academic experience. There were varying viewpoints on the level of stress caused by FA and which specific aspects of FA could be enhanced. Conclusions: FAs were feasible and beneficial. Most students viewed FAs favorably because they promoted learning experiences and achievements, and helped identify support needs for SAs, despite some concerns about them being time-consuming and stressful. The use of SAs facilitated better study strategies. However, potential improvements to FAs regarding the feedback process, assessment schedules, and alignment with teaching objectives were suggested to increase their usefulness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.