Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41555904›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

Cognitive Load Measurement of Using Virtual Reality Headset (Oculus Rift CV1) to Enrich the Anatomy Course and Increase Motivation Among Medical Students.

Leena Ahmed Khalil Alfarani, Amal Alharbi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leena Ahmed Khalil AlfaraniDepartment of Educational Technologies, College of Postgraduate Education, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7199-0377
Amal AlharbiComputer Skills Unit, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the exponential growth of education in recent years, the anatomy course is taught in all medical school departments in the early years to provide a strong foundation for medical education and clinical training. Integrating technological innovations such as virtual reality programs that realistically display human anatomy through computer simulation into lectures may benefit medical students in their studies. Therefore, this study aims to suggest a potential use of VR to reduce cognitive loads in the anatomy course in higher education. Twenty third-year medical students at King Abdulaziz University were given a virtual reality headset (Oculus Rift CV1) with the 3D Organon VR Anatomy application in a quasi-experimental design. The data were collected from students who wore the Oculus Rift CV1 and completed five tasks. Students were then asked to fill out three questionnaires about their opinions. These findings should be interpreted in light of the study's small sample size, lack of a control group, and single-gender population. The study's findings revealed that traditional anatomy teaching methods caused cognitive distractions for students. However, virtual reality headsets were associated with a mean cognitive load rating of 19.7, suggesting a potential to reduce cognitive burden. These findings support the argument for using virtual reality headsets in anatomy courses and opening virtual reality labs in medical colleges. Medical faculty should accept and experience virtual reality technology without the fear of students leaving the dissection lab.

Indexed as

Augmented and virtual realityCognitive loadImproving classroom teachingLearning strategiesMotivationOculus Rift CV1

Identifiers

PMID41555904
PMCPMC12812136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.