ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026
From Disciplinary Societies to Societies of Control: Foucault, Deleuze and the Care of People Under the Mental Health Review Board in Psychiatric Settings.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Disciplinary Societies to Societies of Control: Foucault, Deleuze and the Care of People Under the Mental Health Review Board in Psychiatric Settings.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The number of individuals declared not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder is increasing in Canada. The supervision of these individuals-balancing the imperatives of public safety with philosophies of care-can create significant ethical dilemmas for psychiatric nurses. This article examines the intersection of mental health and the justice system, drawing on the accounts of nurses and service users admitted to psychiatric units. Using grounded theory, the study seeks to deepen understanding of the impact of judiciarization, particularly its influence on therapeutic relationships and the perceived quality of care. Special attention is given to the role of the Mental Health Review Board (MHRB) in monitoring individuals found NCRMD. Grounded in the theoretical framework of Deleuze's notion of societies of control, the analysis of interview data reveals three central categories: (1) the process of involuntary (re)admission; (2) the complexities of the care partnership; and (3) ethical tensions and prejudice. The experiences of users are explored through the lenses of coercive practices, disciplinary structures, and varied forms of social control in the context of MHRB supervision. Psychiatric nurses' narratives point to challenges related to power imbalances, conflicts of professional allegiance, and ambivalence in care perspectives-highlighting the need for ongoing ethical reflection and systemic change in the management of NCR patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.