ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2026
Risk functions with outcome measurement error.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative bias analyses to address measurement error in time-to-event endpoints.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mortality risk estimated from studies that ascertain date of death through linkage to vital statistics registries may be subject to outcome measurement error. As a result, some deaths among study participants may not be captured, some study participants who are alive may be falsely categorized as deceased, and some deaths may be recorded at incorrect times, leading to bias in estimates of mortality risk and survival. Here, we illustrate an extension of the Rogan-Gladen estimator to account for outcome measurement error in risk and survival functions in settings with right censoring. As a motivating application, we consider and account for outcome measurement error that could be induced by incomplete and/or incorrect linkage to death registries when estimating mortality risk among people entering care for HIV in the University of North Carolina Center for AIDS Research HIV Clinical Cohort between 2001 and 2022. A series of simulation studies demonstrates that the approach performed well even when participants selected into the validation study were at higher mortality risk than the main study. The proposed approach may be parameterized using internal or external validation data or used as a form of quantitative bias analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.