ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Molecular Complexity Constrained Early Amino Acid Recruitment into the Genetic Code.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From rule-taking to rule-making chemistry: a minimal population-environment feedback model.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previously proposed chronologies of amino acid incorporation into the genetic code rely on consensus rankings derived from prebiotic synthesis experiments, biosynthetic pathways, or genomic trends. However, the role of intrinsic molecular properties in shaping amino acid recruitment remains largely underexplored. In this study, we reconstruct a complexity-based amino acid chronology by integrating 16 molecular complexity metrics from chemical graph and information theory. Unlike approaches influenced by environmental variability, detection biases, or the evolutionary constraints of genome-based chronologies, our method provides a perspective on amino acid incorporation independent of these factors. Instead of imposing a linear ranking, we derive a minimum spanning tree capturing complexity-based relationships between amino acids. The resulting hierarchy places structurally simple amino acids in basal positions, while biosynthetically complex residues appear later, aligning with existing prebiotic and genomic chronologies. Furthermore, amino acids positioned closer in the complexity space exhibit significantly greater mutational connectivity than expected by chance, suggesting that molecular complexity reflects underlying structural considerations that constrained the genetic code's evolutionary pathways. This supports the idea that the code evolved not only to maintain biochemical stability but also to facilitate complexity-preserving substitutions, ensuring smooth adaptive transitions while minimizing energetic cost differences. Additionally, molecular complexity significantly correlates with amino acid enrichment in LUCA's inferred proteome, reinforcing its role as a fundamental constraint on early protein evolution. Our approach, rooted in intrinsic molecular properties rather than external contingencies, offers new insights into the constraints shaping the genetic code and expands the scope for identifying universal principles of biochemical evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.