Trial reportHIV medicine2026
Psychological responses to interval and continuous exercise in people living with HIV: A single-blind, counterbalanced, crossover study.
Trial report in HIV medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study compared acute psychological responses to a single session of low-volume high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE-LV), high-volume high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE-HV), and moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) in people living with HIV, and healthy controls using a randomized, counterbalanced crossover design.
methodsThe participants (people living with HIV, and healthy controls) completed three exercise sessions in randomized order: HIIE-HV (4 × 4 min at 80% of maximal power output [W
resultsAll participants completed the three exercise conditions and were included in the analyses (11 people living with HIV and 11 healthy controls). In people living with HIV, exercise enjoyment was higher following HIIE-HV compared with healthy controls (p = 0.031). No between-condition differences were observed for affective response or FEI in people living with HIV. During exercise, affective responses did not differ between exercise modalities in people living with HIV, whereas healthy controls reported lower affective responses during HIIE-HV compared with HIIE-LV and MICE. RPE was significantly higher during HIIE-HV compared with HIIE-LV and MICE in both groups (p < 0.05).
conclusionPeople living with HIV demonstrated similar affective responses and FEI following MICE and HIIE compared with healthy adults, despite higher perceived exertion during HIIE-HV. Notably, people living with HIV reported higher exercise enjoyment following HIIE-HV, suggesting that this exercise modality may be particularly well tolerated and positively perceived in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.