ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2026
Microclimates, land cover, and socioeconomic vulnerability shape Anopheles hotspots in Maryland, USA.
Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnopheles mosquitoes pose notable public health concerns as competent vectors of malaria and other diseases. Although malaria is no longer endemic in the United States, recent locally acquired cases in states including Maryland highlight the need to better understand Anopheles dynamics in the region. This study aimed to identify geographic hotspots of Anopheles presence in Maryland and evaluate how land cover, microclimatic conditions, and socioeconomic vulnerability shape their spatial and temporal distribution.
methodsMonthly Anopheles occurrence data (1999-2024) from Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) were aggregated at county and Census Block Group (CBG) scales. Counties were ranked by mean annual presence to identify hotspots. Associations with land cover, microclimatic, and socioeconomic conditions were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation (ρ; P < 0.05). At the CBG scale, significantly correlated variables (|ρ| ≥ 0.25) were used to fit an Extreme Gradient Boosting model to quantify the relative importance of environmental and socioeconomic predictors. Spatial dependence was addressed through blocked cross-validation, and model interpretability was evaluated with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values.
resultsPrince George's and Anne Arundel Counties emerged as primary hotspots of presence with highest observer effort during the analysis period. Seasonal analysis revealed an annual cycle, with peak presence from May to September, coinciding with warmer conditions favorable to vector proliferation. SHAP analysis at the CBG-scale identified habitat availability as the most influential predictor (33.1% of total model impact for low impervious surface percentage) with woody wetland emerging as the most preferred habitat; followed by humid conditions (24.6%), and low elevation (18.2%). Notably, cooler and more humid microclimates within the warm season provide optimal habitat, reflecting fine-scale environmental controls on Anopheles distribution. Therefore, CBG-level analysis within Prince George's County revealed a negative correlation between Area Deprivation Index and Anopheles presence (ρ = -0.35), indicating fine-scale ecological drivers-such as woody wetland habitat, low impervious surface, and humid cooler microclimates-more prevalent in affluent suburban residential neighborhoods.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that fine-scale habitat characteristics and warm-season microclimates structure Anopheles mosquito presence in Maryland. These insights support more spatially targeted vector control and improved public health surveillance strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.