Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41555434›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2026

Lung recruitability determines the impact of PEEP on mechanical power in ARDS.

Domenico L Grieco, Francesca Collino, Irene Steinberg, Gabriele Pintaudi, Antonio M Dell'Anna, Mattia Busana, Antonio Pesenti, Patricia R M Rocco, Luigi Camporota, Massimo Antonelli and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Domenico L GriecoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. domenicoluca.grieco@unicatt.it.
Francesca CollinoDepartment of Surgical Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Irene SteinbergDepartment of Surgical Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Gabriele PintaudiDepartment of Anesthesia, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Antonio M Dell'AnnaDepartment of Anesthesia, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Mattia BusanaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Antonio PesentiDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Patricia R M RoccoLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Luigi CamporotaDepartment of Adult Critical Care, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Massimo AntonelliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Tommaso TonettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical power increases with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). However, its injurious potential may depend on the available lung gas volume, which can be modified by alveolar recruitment. We investigated how PEEP-induced recruitment affects mechanical power.

methodsWe analyzed previously collected data on 20 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who underwent a decremental PEEP trial (15-5 cmH₂O). End-expiratory lung volume and respiratory mechanics were measured to quantify recruited volume, functional residual capacity (FRC), and the recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio. Absolute power and power normalized to aerated lung volume (FRC + recruited volume) were calculated at each PEEP level. Patients were classified as having higher or lower recruitability according to the cohort median recruited volume accrued between PEEP 5 and 15 cmH₂O, expressed as a fraction of FRC (median 0.42).

resultsAbsolute mechanical power increased linearly with rising PEEP (approximately + 1 J/min per cmH₂O), from 20 [16-23] J/min at 5 cmH₂O, to 31 [28-33] J/min at 15 cmH₂O, irrespective of recruitability (low recruitability: + 1.12 J/min per cmH₂O, p < 0.001; high recruitability: + 0.96 J/min per cmH₂O, p < 0.001, p for interaction = 0.12). Normalized power increased in patients with lower recruitability (+ 0.43 J/min/L per cmH

conclusionsAbsolute mechanical power increases with higher PEEP, but power per aerated lung decreases when PEEP produces substantial recruitment. PEEP-induced increases in absolute power do not necessarily imply a higher mechanical load per alveolar unit. Recruited volume and compliance changes are the main physiological determinants of this effect. Among bedside tools, the R/I ratio best identifies whether and to what extent PEEP will reduce or increase mechanical power per alveolar unit.

Indexed as

LungPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory Distress SyndromeAgedFemaleFunctional Residual CapacityHumansLung Volume MeasurementsMaleMiddle AgedRespiratory MechanicsTidal VolumeARDSEnd-expiratory lung volumeFunctional residual capacityMechanical powerPEEPRecruitability

Identifiers

PMID41555434
PMCPMC12895760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.