Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41555402›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Development and validation of a dual-perspective competency scale for novice medical laboratory scientists in Japan.

Kiriko Maekawa, Daisuke Sugiyama, Takamitsu Imanishi, Tsumugi Oki, Kenichiro Ohnuma, Mary O Carayannopoulos, Seimi Satomi-Kobayashi, Seiji Kawano

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kiriko MaekawaDepartment of Community Medicine and Social Healthcare Science, Division of Medical Education, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-5 Aratacho, Hyogoku, Kobe, Hyogo, 652-0032, Japan. 229m804m@cloud.kobe-u.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8994-526X
Daisuke SugiyamaFaculty of Nursing and Medical Care, Keio University, 4411, Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, 252-0883, Japan.
Takamitsu ImanishiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-1 Kusunokicho, Chuoku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Tsumugi OkiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-1 Kusunokicho, Chuoku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Kenichiro OhnumaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Kobe University Hospital, 7-5-1 Kusunokicho, Chuoku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
Mary O CarayannopoulosDepartment of Pathology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
Seimi Satomi-KobayashiDepartment of Community Medicine and Social Healthcare Science, Division of Medical Education, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-5 Aratacho, Hyogoku, Kobe, Hyogo, 652-0032, Japan.
Seiji KawanoDepartment of Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, Asago Medical Centre, 392 Hokkoji, Wadayamacho, Asago, Hyogo, 6695267, Japan.

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJFS2126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompetency-based education defines competencies as educational outcomes and guiding instruction and assessment. In Japan, standardised competency frameworks for medical laboratory scientists in clinical settings are underdeveloped. This study aimed to develop and validate a competency scale for novice medical laboratory scientists with less than 3 years of clinical experience into an assessment tool.

methodsThis study involved scale development and validation conducted in four phases: a preliminary study to test content validity for exploratory purposes, a pilot survey to examine the feasibility of the evaluation sheet under conditions similar to those of the main survey, a main survey to verify reliability and validity and a final phase to establish the completed scale. In the main survey, each novice medical and biomedical laboratory scientist (self-evaluator) was paired with two supervising evaluators from the same institution. The supervising evaluators, comprising educational supervisors, senior medical laboratory scientists or managers, were directly involved in the guidance and assessment of the corresponding novice.

resultsExploratory factor analysis of the self-evaluation dataset identified four factors with 51 items using a five-point Likert scale. The cumulative variance explained by the four factors was 52%, and Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.78 to 0.94 for each factor. The validity of the scale was confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis with the supervisory evaluation dataset.

conclusionsThe Japan Medical Laboratory Scientists Competency Scale demonstrated robust psychometric properties, establishing it as an effective tool for assessing novice medical laboratory scientists in Japan through self- and supervisory evaluation. Those findings would support enhancements in workforce development and competency-based education in this field.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCompetency-Based EducationEducational MeasurementMedical Laboratory PersonnelMedical Laboratory ScienceFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansJapanPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCompetencyConfirmatory factor analysisExploratory factor analysisInstrumentMedical laboratory scientistsScaleValidity

Identifiers

PMID41555402
PMCPMC13041148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.