ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Epidemiology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a population registry-based study.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomarkers of pulmonary fibrosis in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and saliva. Study methods and pathophysiological significance.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and progressive respiratory rare disease characterized by an irreversible loss of lung function, with unknown etiology and poor prognosis.
methodsA population registry-based study was conducted to provide estimates of prevalence, incidence and survival of IPF. The study included all cases diagnosed with IPF in the years 2000–2022 and residing in Tuscany, Italy. Prevalence as of December 31, 2022, was calculated by sex and age class. Incidence was calculated across the period 2018–2022. Survival at 1, 5 and 10 years from diagnosis with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was estimated by sex and age class using the Kaplan-Meyer method. The independent effect of sex and age at diagnosis on survival was estimated by Cox proportional hazard model.
resultsA total of 1,388 subjects with IPF were diagnosed during the study period. The prevalence as of 31st December 2022 was 21.5 cases (95%CI: 20.0–23.0) per 100,000 inhabitants, with a significantly higher frequency in men and in 70–79 years age group (p < 0.0001). The average annual incidence was 4.6 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, with significantly higher incident cases among males (p < 0.0001). Survival at 1, 5 and 10 years from diagnosis was 91.3%, 51.4% and 22.2%, respectively. Women exhibited a longer survival than men (34.8% vs. 17.3% at 10 years), while patients under 70 had the highest survival rate at 58.2% (95% CI: 52.5–63.4) at five years. Cox regression model confirmed a higher risk of mortality for men (adjusted Hazard Ratio – adjHR = 1.52, 95%CI: 1.25–1.84, p < 0.0001) and with age at diagnosis (adjHR = 1.04, 95%CI: 1.03–1.05, p < 0.0001).
conclusionsThe higher prevalence and incidence rates of IPF among men, as indicated by this population registry-based study, align with recent data reported in Europe. Furthermore, IPF is consistently identified as a disease with a poor prognosis, especially in male patients. Therefore, early and accurate diagnosis, coupled with timely management, is essential to improve the care and treatment outcomes for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.