ArticleBMC health services research2026
Assessing the appropriateness of outpatient physician and inpatient bed allocation: evidence from three cross-sectional surveys in Shanghai (2013-2023).
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a structural imbalance in the distribution of medical resources across different types of medical institutions in China. This study aims to evaluate the appropriateness of outpatient physician and inpatient bed allocation between primary care institutions and hospitals.
methodsThis study utilized data from the Shanghai Health Services Survey and medical resource allocation data for Shanghai from 2013 to 2023. The volume of demand for medical resources was estimated using the health service demand method. By integrating geometric analysis techniques with trigonometric modeling, both the quantity of resource allocation and the quantity of resource demand were represented as vectors, and cosine similarity was applied to evaluate the appropriateness of outpatient physician and inpatient bed allocation.
resultsFrom 2013 to 2023, the allocation quantities of outpatient physicians and inpatient beds in primary care institutions consistently showed a supply-deficit pattern. In 2018, the appropriateness of allocation reached its lowest levels, with scores of 0.5400 for outpatient physicians and 0.9599 for inpatient beds. Over the same period, the allocation of inpatient beds in hospitals exhibited an over-supply pattern. In 2013, the appropriateness of allocation for hospital inpatient beds reached its lowest score of 0.5720.
conclusionsA structural mismatch exists in the allocation of medical resources between primary care institutions and hospitals in Shanghai. Outpatient physicians and inpatient beds in primary care institutions are consistently under-allocated, whereas inpatient beds in hospitals are persistently over-allocated. Addressing this imbalance requires a multifaceted approach, including strengthening the allocation of healthcare personnel in primary care, enhancing the development of outpatient services integrated with general practice specialties, and appropriately expanding inpatient bed capacity in primary care institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.