ArticleBMC oral health2026
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of lesion sterilization and tissue repair in primary molars: the role of patient cooperation in a retrospective study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim is to evaluate the effect of lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) treatment on the clinical and radiographic symptoms of necrotic primary molar teeth. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed clinical and radiographic records of 36 necrotic primary molars from 26 pediatric patients who underwent LSTR therapy. Data from pre-operative, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups were extracted from medical archives, with outcomes assessed based on symptom resolution and radiographic changes. A single-session LSTR treatment was performed on 36 pediatric patients aged 4–8 years with necrotic primary molars. Carious tissue was completely removed, and the endodontic cavity was prepared to facilitate proper placement of the medicament. While the necrotic pulp within the root canals was left intact, only the necrotic pulp tissue in the pulp chamber was removed using a sharp excavator. The pulp chamber was then irrigated with 1% NaOCl, and 3Mix-MP—comprising metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, and clindamycin in powder form combined with macrogol and propylene glycol in liquid form—was placed into the cavity to cover the canal orifices. The teeth were subsequently restored with glass ionomer cement. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed pre-operatively, and at 3 and 6 months post-operatively. Statistical analyses, including Cochran’s Q test and the Marginal Homogeneity test, were used to evaluate the outcomes. For the statistical analysis, a significance level of p < 0.05 was applied.
resultsThe overall success rate, defined as the absence of pain, abscess, and fistula with no worsening of mobility or furcation lesions, was 91.7% at the 6-month follow-up. Statistically significant reductions were observed in pain, abscess, fistula formation and sensitivity to percussion/palpation at both 3- and 6-month follow-ups (p < 0.05). By the 6-month evaluation, all treated teeth were completely free of pain and fistula. In addition, 97.2% of the teeth showed no abscess, and 88.9% exhibited no palpation/ percussion sensitivity. While changes in furcation lesions were not statistically significant at 3 months (p > 0.05), a meaningful reduction became evident by 6 months (p < 0.05). Tooth mobility, however, showed a significant decline as early as the 3-month follow-up (p < 0.05).
conclusionLSTR represents a viable alternative to conventional root canal therapy for necrotic primary molars. Its success appears independent of patient cooperation levels, making it particularly advantageous for managing uncooperative children where conventional endodontic procedures might be challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.