SynthesisBMC cancer2026
Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with focus on triple-negative subtype and immune-related adverse events.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy, safety, and PD-L1-defined outcomes of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Breast cancer immunotherapy: mechanisms of immune evasion, biomarkers, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced cardiotoxicity: from immune mechanisms to clinical surveillance and targeted therapies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in breast cancer, thereby informing clinical decision-making.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases from inception to August 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chemotherapy plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in breast cancer. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and pathological complete response (pCR). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse events (AEs).
resultsNineteen RCTs involving 6,546 patients were included. The combination therapy significantly improved pCR(OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.28–2.62, P < 0.001), PFS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.76–0.87, P < 0.00001), and ORR (OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.39–0.96, P = 0.03) compared to chemotherapy alone. OS was significantly improved in the combination group (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.81–0.94, P = 0.0007). No significant difference was found in CBR (P = 0.07). Safety analysis revealed a higher incidence of grade ≥ 2 AEs (OR = 1.13, P < 0.001), primarily non-hematological toxicities, and a significant increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which were predominantly grade 1–2. Subgroup analyses indicated greater benefit in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and PD-L1-positive populations, with optimal PFS observed with taxane-based regimens.
conclusionsThe addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy significantly enhances efficacy in breast cancer, particularly for patients with PD-L1-positive TNBC, at the cost of an increased but manageable risk of low-grade irAEs. Clinical implementation should be guided by biomarker testing and proactive toxicity monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.