ArticleBMC medical education2026
Development and validation of virtual patients for assessing history taking and communication skills among medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe integration of virtual patients (VPs) into medical education is expanding globally, enhancing traditional training and supporting the development of clinical skills. In Malaysia, adoption is progressing, although dependence on imported platforms may compromise cultural and linguistic authenticity. We developed three culturally adapted VPs reflecting the local healthcare context. The VP application, featuring a custom virtual reality (VR) environment, 3-dimensional (3D) avatars and speech functions, was deployed on the Oculus Meta Quest 2 headset. This device provides an immersive, user-friendly experience, allowing students to interact with VPs via hand-held controllers.
methodsThe developed VPs were assessed in terms of their content, face, construct, and concurrent validity, as well as the reliability for use in history-taking and communication skills assessment. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software version 25.
resultsThe VPs showed acceptable content and face validity, indicating that the case design, interface, and simulated environment were appropriate and realistic. However, reliability and other validity measures, including construct validity and concurrent validity, were found to be limited.
conclusionThese findings may have been affected by factors such as small sample size, variability among students and examiners, limited scenario complexity, and technical issues related to speech recognition and system responsiveness. Addressing these limitations in future research could improve the generalizability of the results, while refinements in scenario design, artificial intelligence (AI) integration, and user interfaces are key to maximizing the pedagogical potential of VPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.