ArticleBMC nephrology2026
Evaluation of everolimus pharmacokinetic monitoring based on trough concentration and area under the blood concentration time curve in kidney transplantation.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEverolimus (EVR) is widely used in kidney transplantation; however, the optimal sampling time point for therapeutic drug monitoring and the relationship between EVR exposure and adverse events under tacrolimus-based regimens remain unclear.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed EVR pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy. EVR whole-blood concentrations at multiple post-dose time points were compared with the area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 4 hours (AUC₀–₄). Associations between EVR exposure and adverse events, including proteinuria and de novo hyperlipidemia (HL), were explored using statistical models accounting for repeated pharmacokinetic measurements.
resultsEVR concentration at 2 hours post-dose (C2) showed the strongest correlation with AUC₀–₄ and was superior to trough concentration (C0) as a surrogate marker of short-term systemic exposure. Short-term EVR systemic exposure (AUC₀–₄) was not independently associated with de novo HL, whereas longer treatment duration was strongly associated with lipid abnormalities. No significant association was observed between EVR exposure and proteinuria.
conclusionsC2 represents a practical surrogate marker for short-term EVR exposure in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based therapy. While EVR exposure itself was not independently associated with de novo HL, treatment duration appears to be an important factor, underscoring the need to consider long-term metabolic effects during EVR therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.