ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Development of an efficient in vitro micropropagation and biochemical profiling of Salvia halophila, an endemic Turkish sage.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Plant Propagation to Anticancer Activity: Phytochemical and Biological Evaluation of Water Extracts ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSalvia halophila Hedge is an endemic sage species confined to the salt steppe ecosystems of Central Anatolia (Türkiye), particularly around the Lake Tuz Basin, and is classified as Endangered (EN) by the IUCN. Its narrow distribution, low seed germination rates, and habitat pressures threaten its survival and restrict the sustainable exploitation of its valuable phytochemicals, such as rosmarinic acid and other phenolics. In vitro micropropagation represents a strategic approach for producing genetically uniform and phytochemically rich plant material, thereby supporting both ex situ conservation and biotechnological applications.
resultsThree germination strategies were compared. Chemical priming and direct gibberellic acid (GA₃) applications were largely ineffective, whereas in vitro germination on GA₃-enriched media produced viable seedlings. WPM medium supplemented with 0.5–1.0 mg L⁻¹ GA₃ achieved the highest germination rate (20%). The optimized sterilization treatment minimized fungal contamination (4.4%) while sustaining a high proportion of healthy shoots (73%). For shoot induction, MS medium consistently outperformed WPM, achieving 78% induction and 1.51 shoots per explant versus 50% and 0.86 on WPM. Among cytokinins, meta-topolin (mT) provided the most reliable results, ensuring 90–100% shoot induction with high shoot quality at 0.2–1.0 mg L⁻¹. Rooting experiments demonstrated the superiority of IBA over NAA, with 0.5 mg L⁻¹ IBA yielding 66% rooting and 77% acclimatization. Biochemical profiling showed that micropropagated plantlets accumulated higher phenolic contents (TPC = 15.9 mg GAE g⁻¹ DW) and stronger antioxidant capacity (IC₅₀=24.6 µg mL⁻¹) compared with seed-derived plants.
conclusionThe study successfully established a stage-specific and efficient micropropagation protocol for S. halophila. While WPM medium was more favorable for seed germination, MS medium supplemented with mT and IBA was optimal for shoot regeneration and rooting. The protocol not only enhances propagation efficiency but also increases secondary metabolite accumulation, providing a reliable platform for conservation, sustainable utilization, and potential commercial production of this endangered halophyte.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.