ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026
Tumor growth rate for prognostic stratification and treatment optimization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE combined with systemic therapy.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTumor growth rate (TGR) is a dynamic biomarker for evaluating therapeutic response and prognosis in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) with triple therapy, yet its clinical utility and role in guiding treatment optimization require further validation.
methodsThis study included 68 uHCC patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with systemic combination therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance baseline confounders. Cubic spline models explored nonlinear associations between TGR and survival risk and found the ideal cut-off points. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between TGR subgroups, Cox multivariate regression evaluated the independent prognostic value of TGR.
resultsCox analysis confirmed TGR0 as an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.035, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.013-1.057, p = 0.020) and PFS (HR 1.033, 95%CI: 1.014-1.053, p = 0.001). After stratified for TGR0/TGR1 and matched, the low-TGR0 group showed significantly longer median OS (not reached vs. 13.09 months, p = 0.002) and PFS (12.11 vs. 4.38 months, p = 0.006) than the high-TGR0 group. In the subgroup analysis, after propensity score matching(PSM), the low-TGR1 group demonstrated a more favorable prognosis compared with high-TGR1(mOS: not reached vs. 16.97 months, p = 0.024; mOS1: not reached vs. 11.78 months, p = 0.022).
conclusionsDynamic TGR monitoring identifies heterogeneous therapeutic responses, guiding timely personalized treatment adjustments and prognostic stratification in uHCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.