ArticleBMC anesthesiology2026
Fast-track anesthesia in a pregnant female patient undergoing liver transplantation: a case report.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLiver transplantation (LT) is a critical life-saving intervention that can improve outcomes in patients with acute liver failure (ALF). However, consensus regarding LT management during the second trimester of pregnancy is lacking. For pre-delivery LT, anesthesia and perioperative management are crucial factors influencing fetal survival. Recently, fast-track anesthesia (FTA) has been applied in adult LT, with favorable outcomes. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41-year-old female patient at 22-weeks of gestation was diagnosed with ALF and hepatic encephalopathy. The patient’s condition did not improve after 3 weeks of treatment. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 39. LT was performed using the piggyback technique with caval sparing. We implemented an FTA protocol with total intravenous anesthesia. Dobutamine and phenylephrine were titrated to maintain hemodynamics, and a detector was attached to the abdominal wall to monitor fetal heart rate. The surgery proceeded without complications. Toward the end of the operation, propofol was discontinued, and remifentanil infusion was reduced and continued until completion. After surgery, muscle relaxation was reversed with sugammadex. Five minutes later, the patient regained clear consciousness and was able to follow instructions. On-table extubation was successfully performed. Subsequently, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit. On postoperative day 8, the patient developed threatened labor due to vaginal bleeding, which necessitated an emergency cesarean section, and a male infant was delivered. The patient returned to the surgical ward after a 14-day intensive care unit stay and was discharged 46 days after the LT. The infant was discharged 4 months after birth. At the 9-month follow-up, neither mother nor infant had any LT-related complications.
conclusionsFTA with on-table extubation was successfully implemented in a second-trimester pregnant female patient undergoing LT. Evolving evidence demonstrates the safety and efficacy of FTA in different patient populations; however, multidisciplinary collaboration and implementation of LT in pregnant patients remains challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.