Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41555226›Full record

ArticleBiological procedures online2026

New Candidate Reference Measurement Procedures for MET CNV Detection and Quantification Using Digital PCR.

Jessica Petiti, Sabrina Caria, Laura Revel, Marika Fava, Giovanna Carrà, Raffaella Albano, Sara Gilardi, Tiziana Venesio, Carla Divieto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological procedures online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessica PetitiDivision of Advanced Materials Metrology and Life Sciences, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM), Turin, Italy. j.petiti@inrim.it.
Sabrina CariaDivision of Advanced Materials Metrology and Life Sciences, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM), Turin, Italy.
Laura RevelDivision of Advanced Materials Metrology and Life Sciences, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM), Turin, Italy.
Marika FavaDivision of Advanced Materials Metrology and Life Sciences, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM), Turin, Italy.
Giovanna CarràSan Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Raffaella AlbanoCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Sara GilardiCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Tiziana Venesio *Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Carla Divieto *Division of Advanced Materials Metrology and Life Sciences, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (INRIM), Turin, Italy.

Funding

European Partnership on Metrology 22HLT06 GenomeMET
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCopy number variation (CNV) of the MET gene is a clinically relevant alteration associated with tumorigenesis, disease progression, and therapy resistance in several cancers, particularly non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer. Elevated MET copy number has prognostic value and can predict response to MET inhibitors, underscoring the clinical need for accurate quantification of MET CNV. However, current diagnostic platforms, such as FISH, qPCR, and NGS, suffer from limited reproducibility, lack of sensitivity, and poor metrological traceability. All these factors lead to poor standardization (e.g. in the reporting units and reference intervals), creating a barrier to inter-laboratory comparability and clinical harmonization. Digital PCR (dPCR) has emerged as a powerful alternative, offering absolute quantification, high sensitivity, and robustness. These features make dPCR particularly suitable for the development of Reference Measurement Procedures (RMPs), essential to establish SI (units) traceability and support the production of certified reference materials.

resultsHere, we report the design, optimization, and validation of a duplex droplet dPCR (ddPCR) assay targeting MET and the diploid reference gene RPPH1. Using synthetic constructs, diploid and MET-amplified cell lines, and reference materials, we systematically optimized assay conditions and evaluated analytical performance. The duplex ddPCR showed excellent linearity (R²=0.988), low intra- and inter-run variability (CV≈3.8–3.9%), and reliable quantification across a dynamic range of copy numbers. Measurement uncertainty was rigorously estimated, aligning with metrological standards. Importantly, baseline measurements in diploid cell lines yielded values consistent with the expected two-copy state, confirming accuracy under physiological conditions.

conclusionThis work introduces a rigorously validated candidate RMP for MET CNV quantification. By enabling traceable and reproducible measurements, the method addresses a critical gap in CNV standardization and provides a foundation for certified reference material development. The adoption of this RMP has the potential to harmonize molecular diagnostics across laboratories, improve the comparability of clinical trial results, and strengthen the integration of CNV testing into precision oncology, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.

Indexed as

dPCRMeasurement uncertaintyMET CNVPrecision medicineReference measurement procedureStandard operating procedureTraceability

Identifiers

PMID41555226
PMCPMC12895716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.