ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Identification of the IDA peptide family in tomato and function of SlIDA8 in salt stress.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearch on the flocculation-deficient abscission peptide IDA has mostly concentrated on how it controls the growth and development of plants. However, research on the role of defectin in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) under salt stress remains limited.
resultsThrough analysis of the tomato genome, we identified a total of 11 SlIDA peptides and classified them into three categories based on their phylogenetic relationships. These genes exhibit chromosomal duplication events. Further structural analysis revealed that members of this gene family possess a high degree of evolutionary conservation. Expression analysis revealed that all 11 SlIDA genes are expressed in various tomato tissues, with their expression levels exhibiting significant changes in response to salt stress. Among them, SlIDA8 demonstrated the most pronounced upregulation, suggesting a potential key role in salt stress response. Functional validation demonstrated that the SlIDA8 protein localizes to both the cytoplasm and nucleus. Comparing the performance of SlIDA8-silenced plants with wild-type plants under salt stress revealed significantly reduced salt tolerance in the silenced plants. This result directly confirms that SlIDA8 is an important positive regulator in the tomato response to salt stress.
conclusionsResults indicate that SlIDA8-silenced plants exhibit a more pronounced stress phenotype, characterized by accelerated chlorophyll degradation, increased membrane damage, reduced activity of reactive oxygen species scavenging enzymes, and elevated abscisic acid (ABA) content. This suggests that SlIDA8 silencing enhances tomato sensitivity to salt stress. These findings preliminarily elucidate the role of SlIDA8 as a positive regulator of salt stress in tomatoes providing a research basis for further investigation into IDA function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.