Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41555111›Full record

ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2026

Photobiomodulation as an adjuvant for pain relief and healing pre-orthodontic mandibular third molar surgery: double-blinded randomized clinical trial.

J Rujano-Salinas, A Pérez, A Ramirez, Moreno-Garces, A Bernotti, D Machado, Daniel Nastri-de Luca, Carlos Sanchez-Ramirez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J Rujano-SalinasSchool of Dentistry, Universidad José Antonio Páez, Valencia, Venezuela.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7059-6065
A PérezSchool of Dentistry, Universidad José Antonio Páez, Valencia, Venezuela.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2405-4965
A RamirezHospital Militar "Doctor Carlos Arvelo", Caracas, Venezuela.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6771-597X
Moreno-GarcesDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1089-9721
A BernottiFaculty of Dentistry, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, 1050, Venezuela.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2480-886X
D MachadoSchool of Dentistry, Universidad José Antonio Páez, Valencia, Venezuela.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1931-0866
Daniel Nastri-de LucaCenter for Research and Teaching of Phototherapy in Health Sciences, Institute NUPEN, Sao Carlos, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8005-5719
Carlos Sanchez-RamirezSchool of Dentistry, Universidad José Antonio Páez, Valencia, Venezuela. odcarlossanchez@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6098-5839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) on post-operative pain and wound healing following the extraction of mandibular third molars. A split-mouth, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Faculty of Dentistry, José Antonio Páez University. Patients requiring bilateral surgical extraction of impacted and retained mandibular third molars in comparable anatomical positions were enrolled. Individuals with soft or hard tissue pathologies or systemic inflammatory conditions that could interfere with healing were excluded. One side of the jaw was randomly assigned as the treatment side, whereas the contralateral side served as the control. The treatment side received photobiomodulation (PBM) via a 980 nm diode laser (SOLASE PRO LASER, LAZON®) immediately after surgery and at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. The primary outcome variables were wound healing and pain intensity. Pain was assessed via a visual analog scale (VAS) at 24, 48, 72, and 168 h. Wound healing was clinically evaluated on postoperative days 3, 7, and 14. Comparative analysis was performed via two-way ANOVA and repeated-measures ANOVA. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Thirty-seven patients (32.4% male and 67.6% female) aged 22.8 ± 3.6 years participated in this study. VAS results revealed that PBM controlled pain at 24 h (4 ± 3) in comparison with the control group (6 ± 3) (p = 0.002), at 48 h (4 ± 3 and 5 ± 2, respectively) (p = 0.003), and at 72 h (2 ± 2 and 4 ± 2, respectively) (p = 0.004). Wound healing was significantly better on the PBM-treated side on day 3 (2,1 ± 0,2) than on the control side (3,2 ± 0,6) (p = 0.00), at 7 days (1,5 ± 0,5 and 2,5 ± 0,8, respectively) (p = 0.00), and at 14 days (1 ± 0 and 1,8 ± 0,8), respectively (p = 0.00). No adverse effects were reported. PBM with a 980 nm diode laser significantly reduced postoperative pain and enhanced wound healing compared to the contralateral control side, supporting its use as a safe and effective adjunct in third molar surgery.

Indexed as

Photobiomodulation therapyPost-operative painStatistical analysisThird molar surgeryWound healing

Identifiers

PMID41555111
PMCPMC12816496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.