Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41555097›Full record

ReviewMolecular systems biology2026

The DNA dialect: a comprehensive guide to pretrained genomic language models.

Marcell Veiner, Fran Supek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcell VeinerInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4179-1374
Fran SupekInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain. fran.supek@bric.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7811-6711

Funding

Danish Cancer Society Research Center (DCRC) AI-DRIVERSDFF | Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd (FSS, DFF) 5243-00072BEC | ERC | HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (ERC) STRUCTOMATIC (101088342)EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020) DECIDER (965193)EC | HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme (Horizon Europe) LUCIA (101096473)'la Caixa' Foundation ('la Caixa') HR22-00402'la Caixa' Foundation ('la Caixa') INPHINIT (B006197)Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF) Start Package
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following their success in natural language processing and protein biology, pretrained large language models have started appearing in genomics in large numbers. These genomic language models (gLMs), trained on diverse DNA and RNA sequences, promise improved performance on a variety of downstream prediction and understanding tasks. In this review, we trace the rapid evolution of gLMs, analyze current trends, and offer an overview of their application in genomic research. We investigate each gLM component in detail, from training data curation to the architecture, and highlight the present trends of increasing model complexity. We review major benchmarking efforts, suggesting that no single model dominates, and that task-specific design and pretraining data often outweigh general model scale or architecture. In addition, we discuss requirements for making gLMs practically useful for genomic research. While several applications, ranging from genome annotation to DNA sequence generation, showcase the potential of gLMs, their use highlights gaps and pitfalls that remain unresolved. This guide aims to equip researchers with a grounded understanding of gLM capabilities, limitations, and best practices for their effective use in genomics.

Indexed as

DNAGenomicsNatural Language ProcessingHumansLarge Language ModelsDNADeep Learning in GenomicsDNA and RNA Sequence ModelingGenomic Language ModelsSelf-Supervised LearningVariant Effect Prediction

Identifiers

PMID41555097
PMCPMC12953581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.