Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41555091›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

A clinical-radiomics nomogram based on multisequence MRI for predicting intraoperative vertebral artery injury in patients with primary cervical spine tumor: a diagnostic study.

Xiangzhi Ni, Jiayang Yan, Jiayi Zhang, Fukai Li, Guangwen Duan, Shuming Hou, Lingyun Shen, Hongbiao Sun, Xiang Wang, Minglei Yang and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiangzhi Ni *Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jiayang Yan *Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Jiayi Zhang *Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Fukai LiDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Guangwen DuanDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Shuming HouDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Lingyun ShenDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Hongbiao SunDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiang WangDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Minglei YangDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. ymlsmmu@163.com.
Tielong LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. liutielongvip@163.com.
Shiyuan LiuDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. radiology_cz@163.com.

Funding

Doctorial Innovation Foundation of Shanghai Changzheng Hospital BSCX2024-05Foundation for Youth Scholars of Naval Medical University 2023QN070National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372609 and 82172779Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 24YF2758100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, reliable preoperative methods for predicting vertebral artery (VA) invasion are lacking. The authors develop a novel model based on MRI radiomic signatures combined with clinical and imaging features for predicting intraoperative vertebral artery injury in patients with primary cervical tumors.

methodsIncluded in this retrospective study were 168 patients who received surgical resection for primary cervical tumors. They were randomly assigned to a training set (n = 117) and a test set (n = 51) . Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression was applied for feature selection and radiomic signature construction. A multilayer perceptron (MLP) model and 10 machine learning models were used to develop diverse prediction models. Independent risk factors of clinical variables were screened by Logistic regression, based on which a clinical model was constructed. A combined model was established by combining the radiomic signatures and clinical factors. The predictive performance of the combined model was evaluated in both training and test sets using Hosmer-Lemeshow test and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsAccording to the scoring system, the MLP model obtained the highest total score of 87, meaning that its prediction performance was the best of all evaluated models, so the MLP was selected to construct the radiomics model. The AUC of the combined model in the training and test cohorts was 0.951 and 0.950 respectively, and both were higher than that of the radiomics model (AUC 0.900 in training set, p = 0.010, AUC 0.780 in test set, p = 0.001) and the clinical model (AUC 0.740 in training set, p < 0.001, AUC 0.781 in test set, p = 0.008) alone.

conclusionThe present study presents a nomogram that incorporates radiomic signatures and clinical features, which could be used to predict the risk of intraoperative VA injury in patients with primary cervical tumors.

Indexed as

MRIPrimary cervical tumorsRadiomicsVertebral artery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.