Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41555076›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience bulletin2026

A Question of Origins: Non-neuronal Sources of Amyloid-β.

Andrew Octavian Sasmita, Constanze Depp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew Octavian SasmitaDepartment of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University College Cork, Cork, T12 XF62, Ireland. asasmita@ucc.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7379-6749
Constanze DeppF. M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2868-6932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tau tangles are hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD). While the intracellular localization of tau tangles within neurons nominates them as the primary producers of tau, the cellular origin of Aβ is less clear as plaques accumulate extracellularly. Neurons have been considered the sole source of Aβ, leading to the generation of many AD animal models expressing familial AD protein variants specifically in neurons. However, emerging evidence showed that non-neuronal cells abundantly express amyloid precursor protein (APP) and its processing machinery. Among these, oligodendrocytes (OLs) exhibit the highest expression of amyloidogenic components, produce Aβ, and contribute to plaque burden in vivo. Here, we highlight reports on non-neuronal Aβ production in the context of AD and the function of APP processing in these cells. Understanding Aβ processing in non-neuronal cells might enable the identification of novel therapeutic targets, especially in humans whose brain structures differ greatly from animal models.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesBrainOligodendrogliaAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnimalsHumansNeuronsPlaque, AmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAlzheimer’s diseaseAmyloid precursor proteinAmyloid-βGliaNeuronsOligodendrocytes

Identifiers

PMID41555076
PMCPMC13158349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.