ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Prevalence of Congenital Aortic Valve Regurgitation in a Newborn Cohort.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02753348 (Copenhagen Baby Heart), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Copenhagen Baby Heart
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital aortic valve regurgitation is seen in approximately 1 in 4,000 live-births globally. This study investigated the prevalence and early impacts of aortic regurgitation in a newborn cohort. Between April 2016 and October 2018, all newborns in the Copenhagen Area were offered systematic transthoracic echocardiography in a prospective, multicenter population-based study. Aortic valve function was categorized as no, trivial (glimpse of regurgitant flow and/or vena contracta < 0.1 cm), or non-trivial aortic regurgitation (vena contracta ≥ 0.1 cm). Newborns with non-trivial regurgitation were matched 1:4 with controls (no regurgitation). Among 25,590 newborns, aortic regurgitation was detected in 329 newborns (52% male, median age 11 days), i.e. a prevalence of 1.3% (95% CI, 1.15%-1.43%), with 260 (79%) classified as trivial and 69 (21%) as non-trivial. Bicuspid aortic valve was more common in newborns with non-trivial regurgitation (13.0%) than controls (1.1%) (p < 0.001). Newborns with non-trivial regurgitation had larger aortic dimensions compared to controls (mean ± SD): aortic valve annulus (7.3 ± 0.7 mm vs. 7.0 ± 0.6 mm), Sinuses of Valsalva (10.3 ± 1.0 mm vs. 9.7 ± 1.0 mm), sino-tubular junction (8.4 ± 0.8 mm vs. 8.0 ± 0.8 mm), and ascending aorta diameter (10.0 ± 0.9 mm vs. 9.4 ± 1.1 mm) (all p < 0.006). Left ventricular dimensions and function did not differ between groups. Congenital aortic regurgitation was present in 1.3% of all newborns. Non-trivial regurgitation (0.3%) was associated with larger aortic dimensions and higher prevalence of bicuspid aortic valve (13%), but no early signs of left ventricular impairment. Follow-up will help identify those at risk of progression, potentially due to valvular and/or aortic pathology, who may benefit from regular surveillance, and those who can be safely discontinued.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02753348 (registered April 27th 2016).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41555067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.