ReviewSkeletal radiology2026
Diagnosis and imaging assessment of partial anterior and posterior cruciate ligament tears.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Partial tears of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, accounting for a notable proportion of cruciate ligament injuries and carrying significant clinical implications. Diagnosis requires integration of clinical examination and imaging studies, although arthroscopy remains the reference standard. MRI findings in partial cruciate tears include focal fiber discontinuity and signal alteration without complete disruption. Complementary MRI techniques, such as oblique imaging planes, 3D isotropic acquisitions, and functional devices, can enhance diagnostic accuracy, although limitations persist. Radiographs remain important for excluding fractures and identifying associated injuries, with stress radiographs providing quantitative assessment of instability, despite variability in reproducibility and limited availability. Management strategies depend on whether the ligament is functional or nonfunctional. Conservative treatment with structured rehabilitation may be considered in stable patients, but progression to complete rupture can occur, particularly in young and athletic patients. Surgical treatment is recommended for nonfunctional tears, with standard ACL or PCL reconstruction still preferred over selective bundle reconstruction due to stronger evidence and more consistent outcomes. Associated injuries-including meniscal tears, chondral defects, collateral ligament sprains, and bone contusions-must be carefully evaluated and reported, as they influence prognosis and therapeutic planning. Radiologists play a central role in recognizing partial cruciate ligament tears, interpreting subtle findings, and recommending complementary imaging when appropriate. KEY POINTS: • Partial ACL and PCL tears constitute a significant subset of ligament injuries and are clinically relevant, requiring integration of clinical, imaging, and arthroscopic findings for accurate diagnosis. • Dynamic assessment techniques, including stress radiography and MRI adjunctive tools, provide objective measures of instability, although their accuracy and clinical applicability remain limited. • Complementary MRI techniques, including oblique and 3D isotropic sequences, can improve detection of partial cruciate ligament injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41555030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.